Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

In Ground Zero for Dicamba Drift, State Officials Loosen Restrictions for 2019 Season Against Public and Scientific Advice

Posted on February 23, 2019 in In The News, Pesticides | 388 Views

After months of meetings, and over 2,500 public comments, the Arkansas Plant Board finally decided what to do about dicamba in the 2019 planting season.

As Liza Gross reports in Fern’s Ag Insider, The Board went against the recommendations of state weed scientists, and the vast majority of the members of the public who provided input, when they decided in a 9-6 vote to loosen restrictions on the controversial herbicide.

The new dicamba formulations were EPA-approved in 2016 (and again in 2018) for use with the Xtend line of glyphosate and dicamba-resistant soybeans.  Despite industry promises that the new herbicides would be way less volatile than their predecessors, recent science, and recent history over the past three years, has shown that the new formulations volatilize easily.

Millions of acres have been damaged, many of them in Arkansas, which has consistently been one of the states hardest hit by dicamba drift.  They have also had some of the most restrictive local requirements for dicamba applicators, including an emergency ban in the midst of the 2017 season.

This year, the plant board proposed loosening of restrictions on dicamba use. They did so by adding one more month to the time-window farmers can spray the herbicide, by extending the spray deadline to May 25th.  Given that warmer temperatures make dicamba more prone to drift, the extension later into the season will increase the risk of damage to neighboring areas where non-resistant soybeans or other vulnerable crops and vegetation is growing.

Dicamba drift is a big concern for organic farmers, who can lose sales, or even their organic certification, if herbicide residues are detected on their crops.

Many of those who commented were there to support the state’s organic industry, which is particularly threatened by herbicide drift because pesticide contamination can result not just in crop damage, but also loss of certification.  The new rule does require a one-mile buffer between dicamba-treated fields and certified organic crops (and government/university research stations).

The Plant Board received more than 2,600 public comments about the proposed ruling.  Of those, 2,248 were in opposition to the later cutoff date.

Several citizens testified in person at the February 20th meeting, including Richard Coy, who used to sell honey in Arkansas.  “My family has made the decision to relocate…because it is not profitable to keep bees on a commercial scale in this state anymore,” he told the Board (Gross, 2019).

Also present was David Wildy, who farms cotton, soybeans, and other crops in northeastern Arkansas, “ground zero for dicamba drift complaints.” He testified that he hasn’t seen any “technical or scientific data presented in previous meetings, nor here today, that would support a decision to move the dicamba cutoff date…” later in May (Gross, 2019).

Weed scientists also explained to the Plant Board that a growing body of evidence is demonstrating that “the new dicamba formulations continue to volatilize for at least four days after application at levels sufficient to injure soybeans.” In stark contrast to company claims that applicator training has eliminated drift risk, he testified that “dicamba movement is beyond the control of any applicator in this room” (Gross, 2019; emphasis added by Hygeia).

The Board’s decision will give Bayer and its industry partners another year to conduct applicator training sessions, including assistance for applicators trying to make sense of the long, complicated label on the newly formulated herbicide products containing dicamba.  Since dicamba will now be sprayed in one of the hardest-hit states later in the season when high temperatures will lead to higher risk of volatilization, the potential for drift events will inevitably rise.

Since many farmers in the regions most impacted by dicamba drift have already caved to the pressure and made the switch to Xtend soybeans, other broadleaf vines, trees, and fruit and vegetable crops are likely to bear the brunt of dicamba-drift damage this year.  We will, as always, keep you posted as the planting season gets underway in a few weeks.

NOTE: We have been on top of this issue since they beginning.  See our full coverage for much more.

Source:

Liza Gross, “Arkansas approves expanded dicamba use, dismissing scientific and public concerns,” Fern’s Ag Insider, Date published: February 21, 2019; Date accessed: February 22, 2019.

Posted in In The News, Pesticides | Tagged Dicamba, herbic, Pesticide Impacts, Policy and Politics

Related Posts

Will This 9th Circuit Order Finally Get Chlorpyrifos Out of the Food Supply?→

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

Why Promoting Organic Integrity Must Become a Top Priority for USDA→

Guest Blog: Finding the Root Cause of Organic Fraud→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu