Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

The Organic Livestock and Poultry Practice Rule Becomes Trump Admin Roadkill

Posted on March 13, 2018 in Animals, In The News, Organic | 1,573 Views

It is now official, the USDA has withdrawn the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices (OLPP) rule, as of May 13, 2018. This action will close one chapter and begin the next in a long-running conflict withing the organic community, and between it and the USDA.

The USDA is justifying its actions primarily by pointing to the impact of the OLPP on large-scale organic chicken operations that look and smell, and are managed in essentially the same way conventional ones are, except for the use of organic feed and no use of prohibited pharmaceuticals.

According to OLPP critics, adherence to the stricter requirements for outdoor access and minimal space per bird would raise the cost of organic eggs and chicken, and “change the rules” for producers who had invested in chicken houses that at least some certifiers, and the USDA’s National Organic Program (NOP), deem in compliance with Organic Food Production Act (OFPA) requirements.

The proposed rule would have meant stricter requirements for outdoor access for organic-certified animals.

Nearly all organic farmers (other than those impacted), organic food businesses, and consumer groups active in advancing the integrity and supply of organic food strongly support the rule, which was the end-result of a tortuously long and messy, but open and democratic process.

The Organic Trade Association (OTA) has already sued the USDA over the delay in the implementation of the rule, and now will amend their lawsuit to argue for reversing the Department’s decision to drop it. The litigation will likely take a few years to move through the courts, and will draw added media and consumer attention to the dark-side of large-scale, organic livestock operations.

There were some 72,000 comments submitted in response to the USDA’s latest request for public input regarding what to do with OLPP.

Almost 88% of the comments supported rule implementation. About 7,800 expressed no opinion regarding final USDA action. Out of the remaining ~2,200 comments, only about 50 non-form letters urged the USDA to abandon the rule.

There were ~7,000 non-form letters submitted to the USDA in support of the rule.  This one was

Organic farmers, food businesses and trade groups such as the Organic Trade Association supported the new rule that was just killed by the USDA, along with tens of thousands of individuals who submitted comments to the agency during the review process.

posted on Hygeia a few months ago.

It provides additional details why this action by the USDA is contrary to law, goes against what the vast majority of the organic community supports, undermines the deliberative, open process that is supposed to guide implementation of the OFPA, and will reinforce the arguments of those who assert organic livestock products in the marketplace do not differ materially from conventional, with one exception — they cost more.

This is just the latest of many actions by the USDA that show the Department’s true colors when it comes to defending and promoting the integrity of organic food and farming. It joins an already long list of ways the USDA undermines consumer confidence in organic food and farming.

Source:

Tom Polansek, “USDA withdraws proposal to stiffen rules for organic egg farms,” Reuters, March 12, 2018.

 

Posted in Animals, In The News, Organic | Tagged Organic Farming, Organic Foods, Policy and Politics

Related Posts

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

Why Promoting Organic Integrity Must Become a Top Priority for USDA→

Guest Blog: Finding the Root Cause of Organic Fraud→

So What About the Integrity of the U.S. Organic Grain Supply?→

Guest Blog: Organic Food & Pesticide Residues, One Grower’s Perspective→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu