Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Major Moves: An Acquisition Update

Posted on December 22, 2015 in GMOs | 133 Views

Historic posts are reprinted verbatim from their original source.

Source: Industry News, ISB Newsletter, June, 1998

It seems to get harder and harder to write about the business side of agricultural biotechnology without discussing Monsanto in one way or another. This month is no exception. In fact, in a flurry of recent activity, Monsanto has further strengthened its position in the crop biotechnology arena. There is also some talk that the hunter might also be the hunted, as recent divestitures on the part of chemical giant DuPont have led to speculation that Monsanto might become an acquisition target of the Wilmington, Delaware (USA)-based company.

In mid-May, Monsanto announced that it had reached agreements with DEKALB Genetics and Delta & Pine Land Company to acquire the two companies (1). DEKALB is a global leader in agricultural genetics and a top hybrid seed corn company, while Delta & Pine is a major breeder, producer, and marketer of cotton seed. These acquisitions by Monsanto allow the company to “provide both technology and global reach by creating broader seed platforms that enable [Monsanto] to better connect traits to the needs of growers and processors, and allow [Monsanto] to more quickly anticipate new markets or marketplace trends.”

Monsanto agreed to ante up a total of $4.2 billion in cash and stock for the two seed companies, paying over $100 per share for DEKALB ($2.3 billion) for the 60% of the company it did not already own, and about $1.9 billion for Delta & Pine (2). The price that Monsanto agreed to pay for DEKALB is nearly three times the price that the shares traded for in February prior to the Roberts’ Family (founders and holders of a controlling stake) decision to put its shares up for sale. The premiums reflect Monsanto’s desire to continue building its crop biotechnology and life sciences business.

There was some concern raised in a recent Wall Street Journal article about Monsanto’s debt level given the magnitude of its acquisition activities in the past few years (2). In the same article, Monsanto CEO Robert Shapiro was quick to note that this would not be a problem as Monsanto operates with significant cash flow and is capable of paying down debt very quickly. There was also concern as to the ability of Monsanto to carry out, on its own, its aggressive agbiotech vision. This has led some to speculate that Monsanto will ultimately seek to align itself with a larger partner to create the necessary critical mass to be a major player in the biotechnology-driven agricultural world of tomorrow.

One such possible partner, DuPont Co., recently shed its Conoco oil unit, generating an estimated $25 billion which the company has stated it will likely use to invest in its life sciences business (3). The sale of the Conoco unit is thought by some to precede a major acquisition in the life sciences area by DuPont. Monsanto has been mentioned as one possible target, along with Zeneca and Pioneer Hi-Bred (of which DuPont already owns 20%). DuPont’s expectations for life sciences and biotechnology are not paltry. The company anticipates that as much as a third of earnings will come from this area in another five years, compared with only about 18% now. DuPont has been working in recent years to establish its life sciences presence, having last year spent $1.7 billion for its 20% stake in Pioneer Hi-Bred.

Given the feverish pace at which acquisitions have been taking place in the last couple years, it is not unreasonable to expect some kind of action on the part of DuPont in the near future. What exactly that will be is yet to be determined, and the rumors are flying. At the end of May, there was a report that DuPont might purchase healthcare biotechnology giant Amgen (4). Although neither company discussed the proposition publicly, there were mixed sentiments among Wall Street analysts as the validity of the rumors. As always, stay tuned

References

Monsanto Acquires Two Seed Companies To Broaden Availability Of Agricultural Biotechnology. Press Release (www.monsanto.com), May 1998.
Kilman, S. Monsanto Buys Two Companies for $4.2 Billion. The Wall Street Journal, May 12, 1998.
Warren, S. DuPont Plans to Shed Conoco Oil Unit. The Wall Street Journal, May 12, 1998.
Seachrist, L. Amgen Stock Jumps On Rumor DuPont May Buy Out Company. BioWorld Today, Vol. 9, No. 99, May 26, 1998.

Posted in GMOs | Tagged Economics, Historic

Related Posts

This Monster Dose of Innovation is Reason for Hope→

Cargill Announcement: Just Say No to Glufosinate-Desiccated Lentils from Canada→

UK Soil Association and Dr. Benbrook Launch Monthly “Letter from America” Blog Series→

New Study: Europe Can Feed Itself Without Pesticides and Fertilizers→

A Trio of New Dicamba Stories — Our Take on the Ongoing Drift Crisis→

Dicamba-Resistant Xtend Soybean Sales Continue to Rise as Farmers Fear Drifting Dicamba is Coming for Their Crops→

Two New Reports Tackle Global Food Sustainability→

Science Points to “New” Way to Combat Climate Change→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu