Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Biotechnology companies ready to launch joint advertisement campaign

Posted on December 22, 2015 in GMOs | 107 Views

Historic posts are reprinted verbatim from their original source.

Source:  Tim Todd, Bridge News, March 31, 2000

San Diego–Mar 29–A coalition of seven, competing biotechnology companies is poised within the next several days to launch an unprecedented multi-media, multi-million dollar advertisement campaign to better explain the controversial genetically modified organisms (GMO) technology, a member of the organization coalition’s outreach effort said Wednesday.

The Council for Biotechnology Information (CBI) is in the final stages of readying a North American campaign that will include a television commercial, print advertising, a web site and more, Randy Krotz told members of three National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) committees during a meeting here.

Krotz is director for industrial affairs at Monsanto Co, one of the largest US pharmaceutical and agricultural company.
The CBI, which comprises funding from such US industry giants as DuPont de Nemours, Monsanto and others that manufacture genetically modified seeds, was formed late last year amid growing global debate about genetically modified foods.

Seeds that have been genetically modified to grow corn able to resist pests, or soybeans able to withstand some chemical applications, have become a focal point of concern in some parts of the world. Some environmental activists oppose such technology, saying they are afraid of yet untested side-effects which they say could harm humans and plants.

The CBI advertising effort is expected to last 3 to 5 years, initially starting with a 60-second television spot that will be “very low key, but fast paced” said Monsanto’s Krotz. Monsanto is just days away from merging with US drug maker Pharmacia & Upjohn.

The coalition’s television spot poised to start airing early April will not feature the logos of the specific firms involved in the effort, but will refer viewers to a web site that will list sponsoring companies, Krotz explained.

Responding why the campaign zeroes in on North America first instead of Europe, where the debate on genetically modified organisms has been more vocal, Krotz said it was an issue of timing. The coalition wants to see how the communications campaign develops before taking the effort to Europe.

He declined to specify how much the companies were dishing out for the campaign, conceding only it entails “several million dollars.”

The group is seeking associate support from industry groups and others, although biotechnology firms will continue being prime donors to the advertisement campaign, Krotz added.

Although the matter came up during a separate NGFA committee meeting later Wednesday, the organization’s leadership has yet to take a position on any kind of alignment with CBI. NGFA leaders, including grain handlers, shippers and others in the grain industry, however, stressed the group supports the genetically modified foods technology. The group’s annual convention ends Fri day.

The CBI commercial comes only a few months after GMO products were one of the targeted, hot-button issues of protestors outside the World Trade Organization (WTO) meetings that convened in Seattle late last year.

Among other recent events, American snack-food giant Frito-Lay Inc., manufacturer of popular brands Fritos, Doritos and other chips products, earlier this year told its corn suppliers to stay away from the altered crops. The move came after announcements late last year by Gerber and Heinz that their baby foods will be GMO-free. All three companies, however, note they still believe GMO products are safe for consumers.

With US farmers, meanwhile, the corn and soybean products that provide such traits as built-in insect resistance and the ability to apply weed killers have been popular, accounting for about one-third of last year’s corn crop and more than half of last year’s soybeans.

Posted in GMOs | Tagged Economics, Historic

Related Posts

This Monster Dose of Innovation is Reason for Hope→

Cargill Announcement: Just Say No to Glufosinate-Desiccated Lentils from Canada→

UK Soil Association and Dr. Benbrook Launch Monthly “Letter from America” Blog Series→

New Study: Europe Can Feed Itself Without Pesticides and Fertilizers→

A Trio of New Dicamba Stories — Our Take on the Ongoing Drift Crisis→

Dicamba-Resistant Xtend Soybean Sales Continue to Rise as Farmers Fear Drifting Dicamba is Coming for Their Crops→

Two New Reports Tackle Global Food Sustainability→

Science Points to “New” Way to Combat Climate Change→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu