Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

CropScience deal biggest buyout in Bayer’s history

Posted on December 22, 2015 in GMOs | 71 Views

Historic posts are reprinted verbatim from their original source.

Souce: Financial Times Canada, October 3, 2001

LEVERKUSEN, Germany, – Bayer AG said on yesterday it was buying Aventis’s CropScience unit for 7.25 billion euros (US$6.63-billion), including 1.9 billion euros in debt, vaulting it to number two in the global agrochemicals market.
Analysts said the deal, which had been discussed for months, fitted Aventis SA’s plan to focus on faster-growing pharmaceuticals and to reduce its debt, and was crucial for Bayer in gaining critical mass in the sector.

The deal, the biggest acquisition in Leverkusen-based Bayer’s history, is expected to result in some 4,000 job cuts or 15% to 18% of the combined workforce at CropScience and Bayer’s existing crop protection business.

Franco-German drugs group Aventis will reap 3.7 to 3.8 billion euros from the deal, a source close to the transaction said.
The acquisition will propel Bayer — which has been hit hard by the withdrawal in August of its cholesterol-lowering drug Baycol on safety grounds — into the number-two spot from number seven in the US$33-billion-a-year agrochemicals market behind Switzerland’s Syngenta AG.

“The deal is a strategic must for Bayer and enables them to secure a strong market position at a fair price,” said Michael Vara, analyst at Commerzbank.

But it will not boost earnings until 2004 and will increase Bayer’s debt burden to 15 billion euros next year — when the transaction is due to close — limiting its ability to invest in developing its undersized pharmaceuticals business.

Chief executive Manfred Schneider said he hoped the group would again be in a position to finance larger purchases in the medium term but said nothing was currently planned for crop protection or chemicals.

Bayer reiterated it was keen to maintain the majority interest and management control in any future health care partnership and that any takeover in the next two or three years would be limited in scope.

An industry source said the group would still have the financial clout to pursue acquisitions and may now be better placed to consider a 50-50 joint venture for its pharmaceuticals arm.

Posted in GMOs | Tagged Economics, Historic

Related Posts

This Monster Dose of Innovation is Reason for Hope→

Cargill Announcement: Just Say No to Glufosinate-Desiccated Lentils from Canada→

UK Soil Association and Dr. Benbrook Launch Monthly “Letter from America” Blog Series→

New Study: Europe Can Feed Itself Without Pesticides and Fertilizers→

A Trio of New Dicamba Stories — Our Take on the Ongoing Drift Crisis→

Dicamba-Resistant Xtend Soybean Sales Continue to Rise as Farmers Fear Drifting Dicamba is Coming for Their Crops→

Two New Reports Tackle Global Food Sustainability→

Science Points to “New” Way to Combat Climate Change→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu