Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Glyphosate is Increasing Phosphorous Levels in Agricultural Watersheds — An “Overlooked Impact” of Rising Herbicide Use

Posted on January 31, 2019 in Environmental Impacts, Hot Science, Pesticides | 586 Views

Phosphorous is a key nutrient promoting plant growth, and a standard ingredient in many fertilizer blends.  But if too much phosphorous ends up in the region’s watershed, it can wreck havoc on wetlands, streams, and lakes,  causing harmful algae blooms (like the extreme cyanobacteria algae blooms in Lake Erie last year) and depletion of dissolved oxygen, leading to sometimes-massive die-offs of fish and other aquatic life.

Thus, phosphorus levels in agricultural watersheds are often carefully regulated.  But, as a team of Canadian scientists reports in a brand-new paper in the peer-reviewed journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, the impact of rising glyphosate use on phosphorous loading needs to be taken into consideration, especially where Roundup Ready crops account for a high percent of cropland use.

Glyphosate acid contains 18.3% phosphorous (P) by mass, so farmers are applying additional P to their fields every time they spray a glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH).  But, glyphosate has an additional impact on P cycling, because it is chemically very similar to the phosphate ions that are the primary form of P found in nature.  So, glyphosate and phosphate ions compete for the same soil binding sites.

Once all binding sites are “full,” any additional P — from fertilizer, animal manure, or herbicide — tends to flow off fields in surface-water runoff.

The recent and rapid rise in glyphosate use has magnified its relative importance as a source of anthropogenic P, especially in areas of intensive corn, soybean, and cotton cultivation.

–Hébert et al., 2019

The result is that in areas of heavy glyphosate use, additional phosphorous is ending up in surface water resources.

In other words, “[glyphosate] application inevitably leads to greater anthropogenic P inputs in the agricultural landscapes where it is used, and potentially to greater P export from soils to water bodies via diverse pathways” (Hébert et al., 2019).

The authors made some calculations to determine the trends in P inputs from glyphosate use at both a US-wide and global scale, using publicly-available datasets (i.e.  from the FAO, USDA and USGS).  They also took a closer look at data for 3,055 counties in the U.S., where they factored in changes in agricultural land cover to control for any potential impact from expansion of farmed acres.

Their analysis showed that from 1994 to 2014, global P inputs from glyphosate use increased from 10,300 to 151,300 metric tons per year, a 15-fold increase.  In the U.S. alone, P from glyphosate increased 8-fold from 2,900 to 23,000 metric tons over the same 20-year period.

Extreme algae blooms caused by phosphorous use in agriculture robs water systems of the oxygen fish need to survive, sometimes causing massive die-offs.

The study authors make the case that while still just a fraction of the phosphorous load coming from fertilizers and manure, these numbers show that the P input from GBHs is not insignificant, and in fact “P inputs from glyphosate use have now reached levels comparable to those from sources for which P regulations were initiated in the past” (Hébert et al., 2019).

Thus, they argue, P inputs from glyphosate use should be included in management decisions in areas characterized by heavy GBH use.  They also recommend adjusting the maximum, allowed glyphosate application rate on any given farm based on local soil conditions, since such rates will determine how much P the herbicide is likely to shed into the system.  Plus, farmers could apply glyphosate and phosphorous-containing fertilizers at different times to minimize the amount of P that ends up in surface waters.

Source:

Hébert M-P, Fugère V, Gonzalez A.” The overlooked impact of rising glyphosate use on phosphorus loading in agricultural watersheds,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2019, 17:48-56. doi:10.1002/fee.1985.

Posted in Environmental Impacts, Hot Science, Pesticides | Tagged Glyphosate, Natural Resources, Pesticide Impacts

Related Posts

Will This 9th Circuit Order Finally Get Chlorpyrifos Out of the Food Supply?→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Roundup is Safe Enough to Drink, Right?→

Saving Roundup — Another Shoe Falls→

California Study Raises the Question: Are Monarchs the New Canary in the Coal Mine?→

Europe is Calling for a 50% Reduction in Pesticide Use by 2030, But Insect Advocates Say More is Needed→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu