Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Obama-Era GMO and Neonic Ban on Wildlife Refuges is Latest Trump Administration Regulatory Rollback

Posted on August 7, 2018 in In The News | 261 Views

In a now-familiar move, the Trump administration is rolling back an Obama-era ban on the planting of GMO crops on federal lands managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).  As Reuters reports, this prohibition also included the use of  neonicotinoid insecticides and applies to the federal wildlife refuge system, potentially impacting around 150 million acres nationwide.

The neonic ban on USFWS lands went into effect two years ago and resulted from a lawsuit by environmental groups concerned about damage to non-target species, particularly pollinators.

Grain crops are planted on many wildlife refuges to provide forage crops for migratory birds, including the ducks and geese that are prized by hunters.  Which explains why carrying out “needed farming practices” is the reason cited for removing the neonic ban.

The memo withdrawing the 2014 ban was signed by the Principal Deputy Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, Mr. Gregory Sheehan, a Trump administration appointee.  It states that “a blanket denial of GMOs does not provide on-the-ground latitude for refuge managers,” and makes no mention of the environmental impacts of either GMOs or neonics.

Sources:

Reuters, “Trump administration lifts ban on pesticides linked to declining bee numbers,” August 3, 2018.

 

Posted in In The News | Tagged Bees, GE Impacts, Neonicotinoids, Pesticide Impacts

Related Posts

Will This 9th Circuit Order Finally Get Chlorpyrifos Out of the Food Supply?→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

This Monster Dose of Innovation is Reason for Hope→

New Iowa Centric Verse of the Dicamba Blues→

California Study Raises the Question: Are Monarchs the New Canary in the Coal Mine?→

Europe is Calling for a 50% Reduction in Pesticide Use by 2030, But Insect Advocates Say More is Needed→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu