Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

California Study Raises the Question: Are Monarchs the New Canary in the Coal Mine?

Posted on June 22, 2020 in Environmental Impacts, Hot Science, Pesticides | 1,065 Views

Monarch butterflies need milkweed to survive. Declining populations of this iconic butterfly have been driven by many factors, but until recently, one undisputed factor has received the most attention — the loss of milkweed in the wake of the near-universal adoption of Roundup Ready corn, soybean, cotton canola, alfalfa, and sugarbeets.  And these are serious losses, as mentioned in our reporting about research from 2018 that found monarch populations in parts of Florida started declining as early as 1985, and are now down 80 percent.

But now a new possible explanation has surfaced in an open-access paper published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (Halsch et al, 2020). In a survey of 227 samples of milkweed collected across 19 sites in California’s Central Valley, there were an average of 9 pesticide compounds on each milkweed plant. A total of 64 pesticides were found, including 25 insecticides, many known to be toxic to butterfly larvae and/or adults.

One insecticide (chlorantraniliprole) was found on 91% of the samples! In fact, 58 samples of milkweed contained the insecticide chlorantraniliprole (rynaxpyr) at levels that could deliver to a visiting monarch a dose exceeding the LD-50 for this pesticide (dose that would kill one-half of an exposed population). In a EurekAlert! post on the new study, on of the study co-authors acknowledges that “the ubiquity and diversity of pesticides we found in these milkweeds was a surprise” (University of Nevada, Reno; 2020).

Back in the Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution paper, the authors conclude that:

“Our primary finding is the ubiquity of pesticides in milkweeds in an early summer window of time that monarch larvae are likely to be present in the area.”

Then, they cautiously state:

“…these results are consistent with the hypothesis that pesticide exposure could be a contributing factor to monarch declines in the western United States” (Halsch et al., 2020).

So, based on this research, the average monarch butterfly traversing California’s Central Valley on a warm spring or early summer day is exposed through its diet to roughly the same number of pesticides that the average California resident is from their daily diet, with two exceptions.

Curious about how many pesticides you or your family may be exposed to on a daily basis? Check out our Dietary Risk Index, where you can select a food/year combo from a drop down menu and see what residues were found.  There’s even a tool that let’s you compare organic and conventional foods!

People following the government’s advice to consume well over half-dozen servings of fruits and vegetables daily will be exposed to far more than 9 pesticides daily (20 or more on average), if they choose mostly conventionally grown fresh fruits and vegetables.

If  they choose mostly organic produce, they will likely consume fewer than 9 pesticide residues in their daily diet, and at far lower doses.

These sobering facts lead Hygeia Analytics to offer this hypothesis:

The adverse human health impacts of pesticide use in California will not be significantly reduced until the impacts of pesticides on monarch butterflies are markedly reduced, and vice versa.

Sources:

Halsch CA, Code A, Hoyle SM et al. “Pesticide Contamination of Milkweeds Across the Agricultural,Urban, and Open Spaces of Low-Elevation Northern California,” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 8, Article 162. June 2020.

University of Nevada, Reno; “Milkweed, only food source for monarch caterpillars, ubiquitously contaminated,” Eureka Alert, June 8, 2020

Posted in Environmental Impacts, Hot Science, Pesticides | Tagged Bees, Pesticide Impacts

Related Posts

Will This 9th Circuit Order Finally Get Chlorpyrifos Out of the Food Supply?→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Europe is Calling for a 50% Reduction in Pesticide Use by 2030, But Insect Advocates Say More is Needed→

Implications of the Big Dicamba Decision→

Appeals Court Rules EPA “Substantially Understated” Risks from Dicamba Use, Revokes Registration and Bans Sales of Some Dicamba Herbicides→

Guest Blog: A Welcomed Dose of Straight Talk — “Making Liars of Proponents and Fools of Enablers”→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu