Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

“Environmental Health News” Brings Renewed Attention to Glyphosate Ecological Toxicity

Posted on March 19, 2019 in Environmental Impacts, In The News, Pesticides | 530 Views

Ever wonder about the impact of heavy, year-to-year applications of glyphosate-based herbicides on wildlife and ecosystem food chains? Environmental Health News provides some key, fresh insights in “What’s the world’s most widely used herbicide doing to tiny critters?”

We already know that glyphosate and other pesticides have become ubiquitous in streams and groundwater, suggesting ecological impacts are likely to be occurring.  Indeed, we have reported here on Hygeia on how glyphosate impacts the gut bacteria of honeybees and has been implicated in monarch butterfly declines.

The new piece points out that glyphosate use has skyrocketed over the last three decades. In the 1980s, farmers used only around 11 million pounds annually, but today spray approximately 300 million pounds on U.S. crops each year – over a 2,600% increase! The main reason for this spike in use is the introduction and widespread adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops, a technological “innovation” that reached the market in 1996.

“Glyphosate residues can stick around in water and soil for several months, maybe even years. That means it has the potential to build up to higher levels in the environment with each use” (Konkel, 2019).  In the 20+ years since herbicide-resistant crops were introduced, glyphosate levels in the environment have risen in many areas. And now, scientists are starting to see evidence of the toll is is taking on wildlife.

“In aquatic and terrestrial environments, researchers have linked changes in metabolism, growth, behavior and reproduction of certain fishes, mollusks and insects with exposure to glyphosate-containing herbicides” (Konkel, 2019), such as:

  • Mosquito larvae exposed exposed to a level of glyphosate similar to what is found in the environment showed cognitive impacts that affected their ability to recognize potential dangers.
  • Bees also seem to suffer developmental impacts from herbicide use, glyphosate exposure increased the amount of time it took for them to find their hives, which “could have long-term consequences for colony health.”
  • Several studies have documented evidence of cellular damage and reproductive toxicity from glyphosate in mussels, crayfish, and other aquatic invertebrates.

Impact on the Microbiome

A diagram of the bacterial microbiome of a honeybee illustrates the complex relationship between an organism and it’s microscopic internal tenants. Source: Scientific Beekeeping

An important element of new science on glyphosate impacts is focused on how an herbicide thought to only work on plants is also causing harm to the microbiome of some animals.

Glyphosate works by blocking the shikimate pathway in plants. A series of chemical reactions occur within the shikimate pathway that help synthesize key plant regulatory compounds (folates and aromatic amino acids).

While this process is not found in animals, leading to the assumption that glyphosate is not toxic to non-plants, scientists are finding that some of the gut bacteria and fungi that are part of the microbiomes of many organisms do rely on the shikimate pathway for survival.

The bee studies we reported on last year raised concerns that glyphosate may be affecting the microbiome in some animals.  But, little research has yet been done. Also – healthy soils need a diverse soil microbiome. Is glyphosate impacting some of these tiny critters too?

This Environmental Health News  story leaves us with almost as many questions as answers, along with a lot of red flags about possible hidden dangers of glyphosate-based herbicide use.  We already know that prenatal glyphosate exposures may be impacting babies, and now we learn it may also be hurting our birds and our bees, and the intricate ecosystems within which they live.

The basic message in Konkel’s piece is that recurrent, widespread use of a pesticide with broad-based impacts, some known and understood, others just emerging, deserves much more attention, and in some cases, remedial interventions to slow the ecological bleeding. See the accompanying blog “Dealing with Roundup’s Mammoth — and Growing — Ecological Footprint” for why federal pesticide law will have to be reformed for that to happen.

Source:

Lindsey Konkel, “What’s the world’s most widely used herbicide doing to tiny critters?,” Environmental Health News, Date published: March 18, 2019, Date accessed: March 19, 2019.

 

 

Posted in Environmental Impacts, In The News, Pesticides | Tagged Bees, Glyphosate, Pesticide Impacts

Related Posts

Will This 9th Circuit Order Finally Get Chlorpyrifos Out of the Food Supply?→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Roundup is Safe Enough to Drink, Right?→

Saving Roundup — Another Shoe Falls→

California Study Raises the Question: Are Monarchs the New Canary in the Coal Mine?→

Europe is Calling for a 50% Reduction in Pesticide Use by 2030, But Insect Advocates Say More is Needed→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu