Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Agencies Play Tug-of-War Over Regulation of Lab-Grown Meat Products

Posted on June 18, 2018 in Animals, Environmental Impacts, In The News, Nutrition | 674 Views

In an announcement that appeared to take the USDA by surprise, FDA Comissioner Scott Gottlieb issued a statement on Friday claiming that the agency has jurisdiction over the development and marketing of lab-grown meat, and announcing plans to hold a public meeting on the subject in July 2018.

Lab-grown meat is a hot topic in the food world right now.  Just around a dozen companies are developing the technology to grow “meat” from animal stem cells, and they are backed by some big investors – like Bill Gates and Richard Branson.  They seem to believe that lab-grown meat can help feed the world, without the huge environmental footprint of live animals.

As companies work to bring what they call “clean meat” to market, US regulators were in a tug-of-war to decide who would take the lead on this “food innovation.”  As Politico reports, these two agencies already deal with many “awkward jurisdictional lines” around American food policy.  USDA is responsible for food safety of meat, poultry, catfish, and processed egg products, while FDA takes the lead on dairy, fresh eggs, and most other foods.

As recently as April 2018, USDA was on record saying that “alternative proteins” like lab-grown meat would be under their jurisdiction, and say of the FDA’s bid to take the lead, “they can claim that all they want.” However, USDA insists that “any product that expects to be labeled as meat would come under the same inspection criteria” as other animal products.

This comment by Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue raises one major concern- will this lab-grown meat be clearly labeled as such?  This issue of consumers being able to be aware of what they are purchasing, as well as the critical question of nutritional equivalence to the real thing, is something we are closely watching.  Look for more on this hot issue here at Hygeia as the story develops.

Source:

Helena Bottemiller Evich, “Welcome to the turf battle over lab-grown meat,” Politiico, June 15, 2018.

 

Posted in Animals, Environmental Impacts, In The News, Nutrition | Tagged Future of Food, Meat, Policy and Politics

Related Posts

Research Links Childhood Stress to the Microbiome in Pregnancy, and Suggests Protective Role of Omega-3 Fatty Acids→

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

Why Promoting Organic Integrity Must Become a Top Priority for USDA→

Guest Blog: Finding the Root Cause of Organic Fraud→

So What About the Integrity of the U.S. Organic Grain Supply?→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu