Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

2007 Ethanol Mandate Deemed a ‘Well-Intended Flop,” Politicans Seek a Fix to the Renewable Fuel Standard

Posted on March 9, 2018 in Environmental Impacts, In The News | 294 Views

We have all seen the signs on the gasoline pumps proudly proclaiming “Contains Ethanol.”  The U.S. gas supply includes this biofuel derived from corn due a bill passed in 2007, the Renewable Fuel Standard.  It mandates that the nation’s gasoline contains a certain portion of corn-based ethanol, courtesy of America’s heartland.

At the time, politicians thought they were helping to curb climate change, while also supporting American farmers.  But a decade later it’s become clear that the legislation has had unintended consequences, with some leaders going so far as calling it a “well-intended flop.”

A group of Democrats have introduced a bill to fix the “flop,” as reported in the Washington Examiner, because “it actually doesn’t cut down on greenhouse gas emissions, it expands them…[and] it’s had a significant impact on overplanting in fragile areas of the corn belt,” says Representative Peter Welch (D-Vt), one of the sponsors of the proposed replacement, the Greener Fuels Act.

If passed, this bill would cap the current corn ethanol mandate at 9.7%, with a total phase-out of the program by 2023.  It would also provide incentives for other biofuels that are “truly renewable,” and funding for farmers to convert corn acres to pasture or wildlife habitat.

In an interesting twist, the bill would help refiners in Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) home state of Texas, who are plagued by high prices for the ethanol credits currently required to comply with the existing mandate.

It’s hard to say where this might go in the current political climate, but it’s definitely a hot one.  Remember, almost 250 million pounds of pesticides were applied on the nation’s corn crop in 2016 alone, so anything that impacts how much corn American farmers grow has important implications.

We will keep you posted as this story develops.

Source:

John Siciliano, “Democrats call ethanol mandate an environmental ‘flop’,” Washington Examiner, March 8, 2018.

 

Posted in Environmental Impacts, In The News | Tagged Natural Resources, Policy and Politics

Related Posts

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

Why Promoting Organic Integrity Must Become a Top Priority for USDA→

Guest Blog: Finding the Root Cause of Organic Fraud→

So What About the Integrity of the U.S. Organic Grain Supply?→

Guest Blog: Organic Food & Pesticide Residues, One Grower’s Perspective→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu