Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Glyphosate Paper Honored Among the Top Science Papers of 2016 in “Environmental Health”

Posted on June 5, 2017 in Hot Science, Pesticides, Uncategorized | 505 Views

Our paper entitled “Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement” came out February 17, 2016 in the journal Environmental Health. It was written by John Peterson Myers, Michael N. Antoniou, Bruce Blumberg, Lynn Carroll, Theo Colborn, Lorne G. Everett, Michael Hansen, Philip J. Landrigan, Bruce P. Lanphear, Robin Mesnage, Laura N. Vandenberg, Frederick S. vom Saal, Wade V. Welshons and Charles M. Benbrook.

According to BioMed Central, publisher of Environmental Health, our glyphosate paper was the most heavily accessed and impactful review of 2016, as measured by its Altmetric score (695). As of June 3, 2017, there had been 29,996 accesses of the pdf of the paper.

Since our team did its basic research on the toxicology database and exposure assessments supporting contemporary uses of glyphosate herbicide (aka Roundup), many new papers and biomonitoring projects have reinforced the concerns raised in our 2016 paper.

The EPA set the first chronic Reference Dose (called an ADI back then) for glyphosate at 0.05 mg/kg/day in 1979, the agency has increased it three times. As the chart to the left shows, it was first raised to 0.1 mg/kg/day, then to 1.0 mg/kg/day in 1982, then to 2.0 mg/kg/day by or around 1998.

EPA took another action in 1994 that had the effect of more than doubling the cRfD. In March 1994, the Office of Pesticide Program’s Metabolism Committee reported in this memo their decision that residues of glyphosate’s primary metabolite, AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid), no longer needed to be included in the calculation of glyphosate residues in food.

Up until 1994, published tolerances for glyphosate covered the combined residues of glyphosate and AMPA. Dropping AMPA from inclusion in the calculation of glyphosate residues was comparable, roughly, to a doubling of the glyphosate cRfD.

Serious questions persist over the EPA’s justification for each of these increases (more to come soon on this topic). Had the EPA retained the first cRfD set for glyphosate (0.05 mg/kg/day), the explosion in glyphosate use beginning in the early 1990s would have triggered substantial dietary exposure concerns and the EPA would not have allowed the proliferation of high-residue, high-exposure pre-harvest crop desiccation use of glyphosate.

Posted in Hot Science, Pesticides, Uncategorized | Tagged Glyphosate, Policy and Politics

Related Posts

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

Why Promoting Organic Integrity Must Become a Top Priority for USDA→

Guest Blog: Finding the Root Cause of Organic Fraud→

So What About the Integrity of the U.S. Organic Grain Supply?→

Guest Blog: Organic Food & Pesticide Residues, One Grower’s Perspective→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu