Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

NPR Weighs in on Fascinating Pew Survey

Posted on December 16, 2016 in GMOs, In The News, Scientific Integrity | 134 Views

A recent survey conducted by the Pew Research Survey polled Americans about GMO and organic foods and the importance of healthy eating.  This NPR report highlights  key findings of this survey, including:

  1. Many Americans don’t believe that GMOs are safe for consumption and don’t think there is scientific consensus on this issue;
  2. Food issues are not as politically polarized as climate change and other environmental issues; opinions about GMOs and organic food don’t follow political lines;
  3. The majority of respondents don’t trust the motives of scientists. As NPR reports:

“According to the survey, Americans feel that research findings are influenced in equal measure by the following factors: the best available scientific evidence; desire to help their industries; and desire to advance their careers. In the view of the public, all of those factors are more important to scientists than concern for the public interest.”

At Hygeia Analytics, we spend a lot of time thinking about Scientific Integrity, so this story hits close to home.  And, it’s no wonder such a large segment of the public does not trust scientists when it comes to food safety and nutrition issues. Their track record is shaky at best and unequivocally getting worse.

This is because “special interests” from the biotech industry to those devious organic farmers and food companies have driven public interest science so deep into the forest that its voice is near silent. I have watched this unfold during my career at the intersection of farming and food, science and innovation, and policy and regulation.

Back in the 1980s, science had a respected and generally harmonious voice on the critical issues of the day. But now it’s just a mess, with so many well-funded spin campaigns going on at any time, all of course based on the very “soundest” of science, that the public only gets a headache. I wish I had a formula, or great idea, re turning this around, but I do not.

Source:

Dan Charles, “Americans Don’t Trust Scientists’ Take On Food Issues,” December 2, 2016, NPR

 

Posted in GMOs, In The News, Scientific Integrity | Tagged Policy and Politics

Related Posts

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

Why Promoting Organic Integrity Must Become a Top Priority for USDA→

Guest Blog: Finding the Root Cause of Organic Fraud→

So What About the Integrity of the U.S. Organic Grain Supply?→

Guest Blog: Organic Food & Pesticide Residues, One Grower’s Perspective→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu