Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Key Insecticides Disrupt Brain Development at Very Low Doses

Posted on December 14, 2016 in Pesticides | 123 Views

Some pesticides can disrupt the development of the brain and nervous system at extremely low doses.  A study published in October 2006 provides key new insights into how and why (Slotkin et al., 2006).

The organophosphate (OP) class of insecticides includes some of the most dangerous pesticides still in widespread use.  This family of chemistry has been the dominant focus of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the implementation of the “Food Quality Protection Act,” major legislation passed in 1996.

Whether and how OPs can disrupt the development of the brain and nervous system has been one of the hottest areas in developmental biology.  Major strides have been made in understanding how certain pesticides that impact the endocrine system can block, or over stimulate certain key developmental stages.  The just-published study shows that OP insecticides disrupt brain development through a variety of impacts on the serotonin system.  (Serotonin is a hormone-like neurotransmitter).

The study reaches two key conclusions with important implications on pesticide risks.  First, different OP insecticides impact the functioning of the serotonergic system in different ways, and hence can trigger developmental abnormalities in the brain and nervous systems through different mechanisms.  The EPA continues to regulate all OP insecticides as if they impair health through the same mechanism, an assumption that is not supported in the case of developmental neurotoxicity.

Second, Slotkin et al. (2006) found that some OPs impair neurological development at doses four to five-times lower than the doses causing detectable levels of acetyl cholinesterase inhibition.  The EPA cumulative risk assessment of the OPs concluded that OP uses and residues in food meet the FQPA’s strict new safety standard.  The problem is, however, that the EPA focused on cholinesterase inhibition as the common mechanism of OP toxicity, not developmental neurotoxicity. Recent science shows that developmental problems can be triggered by OP exposures far lower than what EPA has deemed “safe.”

For many years the scientific community has been more concerned about the developmental neurotoxicity of OPs, in contrast to the typically transient inhibition of cholinesterase in the blood or brain.  This study points clearly to the need for EPA to revisit and update the OP risk assessment, this time based on developmental neurotoxicity.  Almost certainly, new regulatory restrictions on OP use will be necessary to prevent developmental risks from OP residues on fruit and vegetable crops.

Sources:  “Organophosphate Insecticides Target the Serotonergic System in Developing Rat Brain Regions: Disparate Effects of Diazinon and Parathion at Doses Spanning the Threshold for Cholinesterase Inhibition.”

Authors: Theodore A. Slotkin, Charlotte A. Tate, Ian T. Ryde, Edward D. Levin, and Frederic J. Seidler

Environmental Health Perspectives, October 2006, Vol. 114, No. 10: pages 1542-1546.  Accessible below, or free of charge at

http://www.ehponline.org/members/2006/9337/9337.pdf

“Successes and Lost Opportunities to Reduce Children’s Exposure to Pesticides Since the Mid-1990s.”

Authors: Charles M. Benbrook, Alan Greene, Chensheng Lu, and Philip Landrigan

Organic Center “Critical Issue Report” 2006.1.  41 pages.

Accessible free of charge at

http://www.organic-center.org/science.pest.php?action=view&report_id=55

Posted in Pesticides | Tagged Human Health, Organophosphate, Pesticide Impacts

Related Posts

Will This 9th Circuit Order Finally Get Chlorpyrifos Out of the Food Supply?→

Research Links Childhood Stress to the Microbiome in Pregnancy, and Suggests Protective Role of Omega-3 Fatty Acids→

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Implications of EPA’s Decision to Renew Dicamba Registration for Over-the-Top Use→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

The DRI — A New Tool for Tracking Pesticides in Food→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu