Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Diverse Cropping Systems Result in Higher Yields and Lower Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Posted on May 30, 2018 in Hot Science | 423 Views

New research out of the University of Illinois looks at the long-term consequences of crop rotations including corn, soybean, and wheat crops, compared to less diverse rotations.

This study was conducted at the Northwestern Illinois Agricultural Research and Demonstration Center near Monmouth, IL, located in a region with “some of the most productive soils in the world” (ScienceDaily, 2018).  The team compared fields with continuous corn and soybean crops with those managed under a corn-soybean or corn-soybean-wheat rotation over 20 years.  They also considered whether or not a field was tilled.

Greenhouse gas emissions were measured in all plots for 4 consecutive years, including carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide.

Tillage and crop rotation were shown to have a significant impact on yields and greenhouse gas emissions.  Specifically, tillage increased yields of corn and soybeans, and both tillage and crop rotation decreased nitrous oxide emissions.

Some of the changes were substantial.  With a corn-soy rotation, corn yields were increased around 20%, AND nitrous oxide emissions of corn crops reduced by around 35%.  Soybeans crops in this plot showed a more modest yield increase of 7%, although similar emission reductions were not observed.

Interestingly, in terms of the yield-enhancing “rotation effect,” the corn-soy rotation delivers as great a yield increase as the more diverse, corn-soybean-wheat.

In addition to raising attainable yield goals and reducing net greenhouse gas emissions, diverse rotations also break weed, insect and plant disease cycles, generally lowering over time the need for pesticide applications and other control interventions.

Sources:

Gevan D. Behnke, Stacy M. Zuber, Cameron M. Pittelkow, Emerson D. Nafziger, María B. Villamil, “Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA. Agriculture,” Ecosystems & Environment, 2018; 261: 62 DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.007.

University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences. “Long-term study shows crop rotation decreases greenhouse gas emissions,” ScienceDaily, 23 May 2018.

Posted in Hot Science | Tagged Climate Change, Yield

Related Posts

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Are We Ready for Grassland 2.0?→

Math Mythology and More of the Same: USDA’s Sustainability Plan→

A Closer Look at InsideClimate News’ Award-Winning Series on How American Farm Policy is Deeply Rooted in Resistance to Climate Change Adaptation→

UK Soil Association and Dr. Benbrook Launch Monthly “Letter from America” Blog Series→

Embracing Change for Good Causes — Reflections on a Provocative IDDRI Report→

New Study: Europe Can Feed Itself Without Pesticides and Fertilizers→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu