Hygeia AnalyticsLogo

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Hygeia
    Analytics
    • Dynamic Presentations
    • Keywords and Site Map
    • Hygeia Analytics – Who We Are
    • Why Hygeia?
    • Funding and “Sound Science”
    • Acronyms and Glossary
    • Sign-Up for Updates
  • Nutrition
    • Introduction and Nutrition 101
      • Good Fat Bad Fat
      • Fatty Acids
        • Primer on the Fatty Acids in Milk
      • Impact of Livestock Feeding
    • Antioxidants
      • Organic Farming Elevates Antioxidants
      • Maximizing Antioxidant Intake
    • Organic vs. Conventional Foods
      • Milk and Dairy Products
        • 2018 Grassmilk Paper
        • PLOS ONE Study
        • Dairy Meta-Analysis
      • Multi Food Meta-Analyses
        • Meat Products
        • Plant-Based Foods
        • Smith-Spangler et al.
        • Dangour et al.
        • The Organic Center Report
      • Food Specific Comparisons
        • General
        • Fruits and Vegetables
        • Wine and Wine Grapes
    • Considering Nutritional Quality
      • Impact of Genetics and Production Systems
      • New Tool for Food Security
      • Transforming Jane Doe’s Diet
      • Nutritional Quality Index
    • Nutrient Decline
    • Other Choices and Challenges
      • Human Health
      • Dietary Choices
  • Pesticides
    • Usage
      • Pesticide Use Data Sources
        • Pesticide Use Indicators
      • PUDS – The Pesticide Use Data System
    • Dietary Risks
      • The Dietary Risk Index (DRI)
    • Risk Assessment and Regulation
      • Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
      • Glyphosate/Roundup Case Study
      • The Lowdown on Roundup
      • Does Glyphosate/Roundup Cause Cancer?
      • 2019 Glyphosate Genotoxicity Paper
    • Impacts of GE on Pesticide Use
    • Environmental, Human Health, and Other Impacts of Pesticides
  • Ag Biotech
    • Key Historical Documents – Donald Duvick
    • Key Historical Documents – Arpad Pusztai
    • Herbicide Resistant Crops
    • Weed Resistance
    • Bt Transgenic Crops
    • Resistant Insects
    • Health Risks and Safety Assessments
    • Regulation of GE Crop Technology
    • Marketing, Economics, and Public Relations
    • Patenting and Intellectual Property Issues
    • Labeling
  • Other Issues
    • Animal Products
    • The Future of Food
    • Global Food Security
    • Natural Resources and Climate Change
    • Alternatives to Industrial Ag
    • Policy and Politics
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Soil Health
    • Yields
  • Recent Posts
    • Hot Science
    • In The News
    • Hygeia’s Blog
  • Special
    Coverage
    • Organic Apples in Washington State
    • Dicamba Drift Crisis
    • Organic Food Consumption Lowers Cancer Risk
    • Organic Integrity

Lectin Research

Posted on December 23, 2015 in GMOs, Scientific Integrity | 117 Views

Historic posts are reprinted verbatim from their original source.

Source: Transcript from Channel 4 News (UK), October 15, 1999

Andrew Veitch reported that biotech companies have invested millions in trying to engineer potatoes, maize and grapes to carry their own insecticides called lectins. That’s one reason for the alarm when Dr.Arpad Pusztai, a world expert on lectins, warned the crops might be dangerous, this before any of them had come to market. His research, based on feeding potatoes with lectin to rats, was published in the medical journal the Lancet today, after being rubbished by much of the scientific establishment.It is still highly controversial. The experts chosen to referee the work were divided. But work at Dundee University and the Scottish Crop Research Institute, also published in the Lancet today, also raised potentially more serious concerns. They tested lectins not on rats but on human blood cells.

Dr.Caroline Bolton-Smith (Dundee University):I think what it’s saying to companies, industry, out there, who may be considering putting lectins into foods, that it1s certainly not something that should be done at the moment, until we have a firm idea of what those lectins are doing to human cells and human health.

Andrew Veitch: Snowdrops, like most plants, produce poisonous proteins called lectins, to defend themselves against those who would eat them, from bugs to humans. They work by disrupting the organisation of cells, or communication between them. They affect the immune system and the development of cells; that is why they are being tested as natural pesticides. The gene for the lectin has been inserted into potatoes and maize.

Now it was thought that the snowdrop lectin would not harm humans, but amazingly no one had tested it on human cells. That is what the scientists in Dundee have now done, and they found the lectin binds to white blood cells. That suggests,they say,that it could damage the human immune system. They don’t know that,the work now needs to be done, but at this stage they say it’s a red flag for the companies developing GM crops with snowdrop lectins.

The biotech firm Novartis, which is developing snowdrop lectin in maize said:”We are taking notice of the red flag and we will make sure it’s evaluated before we go any further.”

While the work of the Dundee teams only applies to lectins, they are concerned about GM foods already on the market.

Dr.Caroline Bolton-Smith (Dundee University): If there are going to be any health effects they may only come out in the next 10 or 20 years. We still have time to say, ok – there is some slight evidence there may be some detrimental effects, and to do something about it. So to ignore the possibility of risk I think is probably not wise.

Andrew Veitch: The problem, as the Lancet found when it decided to publish Dr.Pusztai’s paper, is that pressure to push ahead with the technology is intense.

Dr.Richard Horton (Editor the Lancet): There are extreme forces at play in this debate. There is a great deal of potential research investment in the UK that could come from food technology industries, and any concerns about the safety of these foods could jeopardise this huge investment. So I can understand why scientists would be very anxious about jeopardising that investment. But we need to listen to what the public are saying. And the public are saying, please take it slow.

Andrew Veitch: Which is why scientists at Sussex University will next week launch a plan to dismantle the barricades between government, scientists and consumers.

Andy Stirling (Sussex University): Many of the issues of greatest concern to the public aren’t being addressed generally, as there is this, as I described it, something of a siege mentality. (It) obstructs good communication between a scientific community who are doing their best to reveal the full scope of the effects of these technologies, and trying to reassure the public as much as they can. But the communication is really not working as it should.

Andrew Veitch: After Northern Ireland, the new minister in charge of GM foods is no stranger to the siege mentality. There are hopes that under Mo Mowlem’s leadership communication might improve.

Posted in GMOs, Scientific Integrity | Tagged Historic, Human Health

Related Posts

Research Links Childhood Stress to the Microbiome in Pregnancy, and Suggests Protective Role of Omega-3 Fatty Acids→

FAQs re Biden-Harris Ag and EPA Transition Priorities→

Neonic Seed Treatments in the (Science) News→

Dr. Benbrook Testifies Before the Philadelphia City Council as they Consider Glyphosate Ban→

Guest Blog: The Big Meat Gang Is Getting Awfully Smelly→

Consumer Reports Takes on Reducing Pesticide Dietary Risks→

Roundup is Safe Enough to Drink, Right?→

Guest Blog: Bandaids, Immunological Chaos, and Living With COVID-19 in the Neighborhood→

©2016 Hygeia-Analytics.com. All Rights Reserved.

Menu